Gerald Sibayan’s Green Card Revoked After Aiai Delas Alas’ Petition: A Legal Perspective

Introduction

In a significant legal development, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has revoked the green card petition filed by Aiai Delas Alas for her estranged husband, Gerald Sibayan. This decision, issued on March 17, 2025, has raised questions about the implications of such actions on immigration status and the responsibilities of petitioners.(PhilNews)

Background of the Case

Aiai Delas Alas, a U.S. citizen, married Gerald Sibayan in 2017. As part of their marriage, Aiai filed a Petition for Alien Relative on July 15, 2021, to secure a green card for Gerald. The petition was approved, and Gerald was in the process of obtaining his green card when the couple separated in October 2024. Aiai confirmed the separation, stating that Gerald initiated it via chat, expressing his desire for a child and his unhappiness with the marriage.

Revocation of the Green Card Petition

On January 8, 2025, Aiai appealed to the USCIS to revoke her petition for Gerald’s green card. The USCIS reviewed the case and, on March 17, 2025, issued a decision stating, “After a thorough review of your petition and the record of evidence, we must inform you that the approval of your petition has been automatically revoked.” This decision is final, with no option for appeal. The revocation affects Gerald’s work and travel permits in the U.S.

Legal Implications of Petition Revocation

The revocation of a green card petition has significant legal consequences. It terminates the beneficiary’s eligibility for permanent residency and associated benefits. In this case, Gerald Sibayan’s work authorization and travel privileges are now nullified. Additionally, the revocation may impact his future immigration applications, as the circumstances leading to the revocation could be scrutinized in subsequent proceedings.

Role of the Petitioner

As the petitioner, Aiai Delas Alas had the legal right to request the revocation of the petition. Her decision was influenced by evidence of infidelity on Gerald’s part, which she presented during the appeal process. Her legal counsel, Atty. Pia Dyquiangco of the Lewis Law Group in Santa Ana, California, supported this action, stating that it was within Aiai’s prerogative to withdraw her support for the petition.

Public Reaction and Commentary

The public’s response to the revocation has been mixed. Some individuals express support for Aiai’s decision, viewing it as a justified response to betrayal. Others discuss the broader implications of such actions on immigration policies and personal relationships. Discussions often reflect on the responsibilities of petitioners and the potential consequences for beneficiaries when relationships deteriorate.

Conclusion

The revocation of Gerald Sibayan’s green card petition underscores the complexities of immigration law and the significant role petitioners play in the process. This case highlights the importance of maintaining integrity in relationships and the potential legal ramifications when trust is broken. As immigration laws continue to evolve, this incident serves as a reminder of the serious responsibilities associated with sponsoring individuals for permanent residency.

Related Articles

Gerald Sibayan’s Green Card Application Revoked by USCIS
Aiai Delas Alas Refuses to Revoke Gerald Sibayan’s Green Card Despite Split
Aiai Delas Alas Green Card Petition For Gerald Sibayan: “Automatically Revoked”