In a bombshell interview that has social media buzzing, Dr. Hayden Kho has finally spoken out about Katrina Halili’s jaw-dropping ₱100-million moral damages claim. The former couple’s most scandalous chapter—centered on secretly filmed sex videos—has reignited debate across the country. Hayden’s blunt assertion, “Parang gusto niya akong pagkakitaan!” (“It’s like she wants to profit off me!”) left netizens stunned and reopened painful memories for those who followed this saga from the start.

The ₱100-Million Lawsuit: A Quick Recap

Katrina Halili, now an established actress, filed a case under the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act (RA 9262) in April 2025, accusing Hayden of secretly recording her during intimate moments and then allowing the videos to spread online. Her legal team, led by Atty. Raymund Palad, insisted on a ₱100-million moral damages demand. According to Atty. Palad, filing a case of this magnitude requires a staggering ₱3-million docket fee alone—an amount that immediately made headlines.

Inside the Pasig City Regional Trial Court (Branch 159), Judge Rodolfo Bonifacio even instructed Hayden’s mother, Irene Kho, to sit behind the bench during Katrina’s testimony so the actress wouldn’t have to see her ex-boyfriend’s family in the courtroom. The convicted doctor-turned-media personality has been dogged by public scrutiny ever since the videos leaked, and this new monetary claim has only intensified the spotlight.

Hayden Speaks Out: “She Wants to Profit from Me!”

In an exclusive segment aired on Startalk (April 10, 2025), host Boy Abunda pressed Hayden on whether he truly believed Katrina was entitled to ₱100 million. Flanked by his attorney, Atty. Lorna Kapunan, Hayden did not mince words:
“You know—I just think she’s trying to make money off of me.”

He went on to argue that no formal contract or prior agreement existed between them regarding the videos. As Atty. Kapunan emphasized, “There was no contract produced, so we objected. The court said, ‘Please produce the contract.’” That demand for paperwork underscored a legal stalemate: Katrina’s team needed proof of an agreement to support a claim so steep, while Hayden insisted none had ever existed.

Katrina’s Testimony: A Painful Re-Examination

When Katrina took the stand, her voice trembled with emotion. For her, each mention of the videos felt like reliving the trauma.
“That videotape was endlessly circulated. I didn’t even watch it; I didn’t want to see it,” she told Startalk.

Her lawyer, Atty. Palad, confirmed that Katrina’s testimony aimed to prove violation of RA 9262 and substantiate the ₱100-million claim. “Ms. Katrina testified to prove her case against Hayden, especially the RA 9262 violation, and her claim of one hundred million,” he said.

The court has set another hearing on April 19, and both sides remain tight-lipped about specific details, citing a gag order.

Inside the Courtroom: Tension and Tears

Observers recall the tension inside Branch 159 that day. As Katrina spoke, Hayden’s mother was led out of sight; the judge did not want Irene to witness her son’s public cross-examination. Observers said the air grew heavy with each exchange—Hayden’s lawyers challenging every assertion, Katrina battling tears as she described how ashamed and violated she felt.

After Katrina’s testimony, Hayden hurried out of the courtroom, refusing further comment:
“Let’s just wait for the hearing to finish. We’ll wait for the court to decide.”

Meanwhile, Katrina admitted she struggled to make eye contact. “I really can’t handle seeing him… Of course, the anger just comes flooding back,” she said.

Netizen Fallout: “This Is Going to Get Even Uglier”

Since the Startalk interview aired, hashtags like #HaydenVsKatrina and #₱100MillionDrama have trended on X and TikTok. Comments range from sympathetic to outraged:

“100 million?!?! This is insane. I can’t believe they’re fighting over this.”

“Hayden’s right—where was her contract? How can she demand that much?”

“Katrina, stay strong—don’t let him off the hook!”

Some netizens pointed out the broader implications: What does a civil suit under RA 9262 signal for other victims of non-consensual recordings? Could this case set a legal precedent for moral damage claims in digital sex crimes? The debate has transcended gossip columns, sparking real questions about privacy, consent, and accountability in the age of social media.

A Scandal That Refuses to Die

For those who remember the original sex-video scandal in 2020, this new chapter feels like déjà vu. Back then, leaked clips forced Hayden out of his medical practice and thrust Katrina into unwelcome public humiliation. Both tried to rebuild their lives—Hayden pursued new ventures, Katrina focused on her acting career—but the specter of that scandal never truly faded.

Now, with the ₱100-million demand front and center, the saga has re-exposed old wounds. Hayden’s claim that he never asked Katrina for money and Katrina’s insistence that she deserves moral reparation paint a picture of two people still at odds—neither willing to truly let go.

What’s Next? More Hearings, More Headlines

The next court date on April 19 will be critical. Attorneys for both sides have hinted at bombshell evidence—Hayden’s team demanding a written contract that might never exist, Katrina’s camp ready to present text messages and witness testimonies to prove emotional damages.

No matter the outcome, one thing is certain: this story is far from over. From secret recordings to explosive courtroom drama, the Hayden Kho–Katrina Halili saga continues to grip the nation and will likely do so until the final verdict is delivered.

Note: For more details on this case, follow updates from ABS-CBN News, Startalk, and local court bulletins. Whether you support one side or remain undecided, the stakes of this legal battle go beyond two individuals—they may redefine how Philippine courts handle digital-era abuses and moral compensation claims.